Los mejores monitores para juegos 2021: Budget, 144Hz, G-Sync y más

• Frecuencia de actualización: cuanto más grande, mejor. Esto le indica el número de veces su monitor se actualiza con nueva información por segundo-expresada en hercios (Hz)-y, por lo tanto, cuántos fotogramas por segundo (fps) puede mostrar el monitor. Los números más grandes equivalen a imágenes más suaves. La frecuencia de actualización es especialmente importante para los jugadores, por lo que querrá buscar un monitor con al menos 75 Hz (la mayoría de los monitores de juegos ofrecen al menos 144 Hz), combinado con el tiempo de respuesta más bajo que pueda encontrar.

Los mejores monitores-para-juegos que puedes comprar hoy

El Dell S3220DGF es el mejor monitor para juegos para la mayoría. Para empezar, cuenta con una frecuencia de actualización rápida, un tiempo de respuesta bajo y FreeSync Premium Pro para combatir el desgarro de la pantalla con estándares y contenido HDR . Además de eso, este monitor de 32 pulgadas ofrece una gran cantidad de espacio en pantalla vertical sin la necesidad de desplazarse y 1440p de resolución, el punto óptimo actual entre la calidad de imagen y el rendimiento de los juegos. Su curva 1800R también se presta bien a la inmersión y, además de los juegos, descubrimos que también es un gran monitor para la productividad general y cualquier cosa intermedia.

Nuestras pruebas demostraron que la pantalla tiene un retraso de entrada bajo y una respuesta rápida del panel para los jugadores competitivos, e incluso obtuvimos Compatibilidad con G-Sync para trabajar en él, a pesar de que no está certificado para hacerlo. Este es un monitor fantástico para aquellos con PC de juegos de presupuesto medio a alto.

Leer: revisión de Dell S3220DGF

El Gigabyte G27F es el 27 pulgadas más barata en esta página, pero aún ofrece un rendimiento de juego estelar, elevado por una sobremarcha fantástica que es una de las mejores implementaciones que hemos visto últimamente. En la configuración máxima, la saturación del monitor ofrecía una imagen sin borrosidad visible o artefactos fantasma.

En términos de velocidad, esta pantalla de 1080p se mantuvo frente a otros monitores de 144 Hz en lo que respecta al tiempo de respuesta y el retraso de entrada. Y hablando de esa resolución FHD, la rápida frecuencia de actualización de la G27F compensó su baja densidad de píxeles al alcanzar 144 fps.

En términos de calidad de imagen, esta pantalla ofrece una relación de color rica y saturada y un contraste que alcanza un impresionante 1.165: 1 después de nuestra configuración de calibración recomendada (consulte la página 1 de nuestra revisión). A este precio, el G27F es difícil de superar en la categoría de 27 pulgadas.

Sin embargo, si realmente desea quedarse por debajo de $ 200, consulte nuestro revisión del Acer XFA240 , que suele ser $ 200 o más barato .

Leer: Revisión de Gigabyte G27F

Para una experiencia de juego premium nítida, de alta resolución, el LG 27GN950-B es el mejor monitor de juegos 4K. Esta pantalla logró algunas de las mejores puntuaciones de retraso de entrada que jamás hayamos visto, con números de tiempo de respuesta que coinciden con otros monitores de 144 Hz. Si tiene una tarjeta gráfica lo suficientemente potente como para admitir altas velocidades de cuadro en 4K, este monitor no tendrá problemas para mantenerse al día.

Los juegos se verán más coloridos en el LG 27GN950-B, gracias a una gama de colores que se extiende hasta un enorme 133,9% de sRGB . Mientras tanto, HDR se ve increíble, debido a la retroiluminación de la matriz de borde del monitor y la función de atenuación local. El contenido HDR disfrutó de una relación de contraste de 8.475,3: 1, lo que lo convierte en un excelente sustituto de una Monitor FALD .

Pero si está buscando una pantalla 4K más grande u otras funciones, consulte nuestro lista de los mejores monitores de juegos 4K .

Leer : LG 27GN950-B revisión

Si te gusta que tus juegos se vean más coloridos, el MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD es el mejor monitor de juegos para tu plataforma. Este monitor publicó la gama de colores más amplia que jamás hayamos registrado: 112,19% de DCI-P3 después de nuestra calibración recomendada. El 90% de DCI-P3 sería impresionante, por lo que esta es una pantalla saturada de color.

El contraste también es fuerte para un panel IPS, alcanzando 1,129.1: 1 después de nuestra calibración. Y para aquellos preocupados por la velocidad, esta pantalla de 165Hz se mantuvo al día con el Gigabyte M27Q de 170Hz en nuestras pruebas

Los puristas del color, sin embargo, lamentarán la falta de un modo sRGB, considerando que la cobertura sRGB del MAG274QRF-QD es del 166.33%. Su luz estroboscópica de fondo para combatir el desenfoque de movimiento también es una decepción. No puede usar Adaptive-Sync con él, el brillo baja en aproximadamente un 50% y creó un efecto fantasma que resultó en un efecto de paralaje con movimiento rápido. Además de eso, este es otro monitor de juegos que ofrece HDR pero sin ningún aumento de imagen notable sobre SDR.

Pero si puede superar esas advertencias, disfrutará del monitor más colorido que jamás haya visto. nuestro laboratorio.

Leer: Revisión de MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD

The Viotek GNV34DBE is a well-performing and affordable curved gaming monitor. Its 1500R curve proved to add an immersive touch while gaming, helping to fill our peripheral vision. Despite its tight curve, we still found the GNV34DBE fit for working. There was no distortion, and we enjoyed having multiple windows open for boosted productivity.

But it’s not just about the GNV34DBE’s curve. You also get a 144 Hz refresh rate and response times and input lag that kept up with 144 Hz rivals during our testing. On the battlefield, we realized the high pixel density of a 1440p screen and smooth gaming without any screen tearing, thanks to FreeSync. Color and contrast was competitive with pricier gaming displays too.

With its edge-lit backlight, the GNV34DBE also makes a good HDR display, offering a noticeable improvement over your typical SDR monitor. At its low price, the build quality of the stand is lacking. But for a speedy gaming monitor with an effective curve, the Viotek GNV34DBE is a solid deal.

Read: Viotek GNV34DBE review

Gigabyte’s Aorus CV27Q is the best 1440p gaming monitor when it comes to high-speed gaming performance. With its impressive specs, it shined in our input lag and response time tests when pitted against 144 Hz rivals. Sure, you could get slightly better performance from the 1080p version, the Aorus CV27F, but then you wouldn’t be getting that sharper QHD resolution or higher pixel density (109ppi).

With a VA panel offering 3,000:1 contrast, image quality is no joke either. The CV27Q has a low black level that made image depth look great, particularly with HDR titles. But as far as HDR goes, this monitor only goes up to 400 nits brightness; we prefer HDR displays that hit at least 600 nits.

Bonus features include Aorus’ active noise cancellation (ANC) feature, which uses two mics on the front bezel to reduce background noise others may hear coming from your gaming headset, a 1500R curve and RGB lighting on the back. But if money is (somehow) no object, the over-$2,000 Acer Predator X35 is a dream come true, and the Asus ROG Strix XG279Q on this page is a hair faster.

Read: Aorus CV27Q review 

If you have extra room in your budget and want to squeeze out that extra drop of performance from your 1440p screen, the Asus ROG Strix XG27AQ is the best gaming monitor for you. This screen is ready to compete with the speediest of screens, competing well against other 165-170 Hz screens in our response time test and falling just 1-3ms behind in our input lag test.

Out of the box, we recorded solid IPS contrast (1,158.4:1). You’ll want to calibrate to get rid of some visible grayscale tracking errors, but our recommended settings can help you there. Plus, this is also an excellent HDR monitor, thanks to a dynamic contrast feature that bumps contrast up to a whopping 22,506.9:1.

Not only does it have the sharper resolution of your dreams, but it’s one of the rare monitors to allow you to run blur reduction alonsiger side screen tear-fighting Adaptive-Sync.

Alternatively, the Asus ROG Strix XG279Q is another fantastic 1440p option with similar performance. But for slightly less money as of writing ($500 versus $570, respectively), the XG279Q features one of the best motion blur implementations we’ve seen and the rare ability to run motion blur alongside Adaptive-Sync.

More: Asus ROG Strix XG27AQ review

The Razer Raptor 27 is the best gaming monitor for 144Hz refresh ra tes. It’ll make any gamer you know jealous with premium touches, like an RGB stand, flat green cables for cable management and drool-worthy build quality. Plus, HDR delivery is some of the best we’ve seen in an edge-lit panel yet.

Despite its 144Hz refresh rate, the Raptor 27 was able to stay competitive with 165Hz monitors in our benchmarking. There wasn’t significant motion blur, but finicky, pro-level players will have to choose between dealing with it or activating the backlight strobe, which limits you to 120Hz, reduces brightness by 40% and grays out FreeSync and G-Sync Compatibility.

Read: Razer Raptor 27 review

For speed demons, a 240 Hz monitor hits the spot. Up until recently, that level of speed required two things: settling for 1080p resolution and a TN panel. But the Samsung 27-inch CRG5 (there’s also a 24-inch CRG5) is the best gaming monitor in this class. It’s special because it manages that speed in our favorite type of LCD panel, VA. Not only does it deliver the high contrast and saturated color that makes VA popular, it’s the fastest monitor we’ve ever tested.

We encountered few flaws during testing. The biggest one in terms of image quality was an inaccurate HDMI Black Level setting. Plus, the only form of Adaptive-Sync is G-Sync Compatibility. But besides those small caveats, our gaming experience was a record-breaking pleasure.

Read: Samsung 27-Inch CRG5 review

The 32-inch Samsung Odyssey G7 is in a class all its own. It’s one of Samsung’s 1000R screens, meaning it’s one of the curviest gaming monitors you can find on the market. If you’re a fan of the immersive feel of a curved monitor, the 32” Odyssey G7 will elevate this experience even higher.

At 32 inches, the Odyssey G7’s amazing 1000R curve drew us in, whether we were playing games or doing work. With this curvature we could view productivity apps without any image distortion, and when gaming our vision was filled with the action. The 32-inch, 16:9 build offers ample height for productivity and, coupled with 1440p resolution, hits a sweet spot for gaming.

In terms of image quality, the 32-inch Odyssey G7 proved accurate before we even calibrated it while boasting a 2,121:1 contrast ratio, according to our testing.

In our response time benchmarking, this monitor kept up with similarly specced screens, doing justice to the 240Hz category. If you’re looking for high-end speed, image quality and form factor, this is it.

Read: Samsung Odyssey G7 32-inch review 

If you want a 27-inch screen with sufficient speed and a high-contrast, colorful image, the MSI Optix MAG272CQR is the best gaming monitor for you. The monitor did well in our response time testing, even matching some 170 Hz screens. Input lag, however, was a smidge behind 165 and 170 Hz rivals but only by 1-4ms, (depending on the comparison monitor). But with FreeSync working swimmingly and no blur, we loved gaming on the MAG272CQR.

The gaming experience is elevated by the type of contrast that makes VA stand out against IPS. You’ll need to tweak the monitor to see its maximum brightness and contrast. But after we calibrated the monitor, we recorded an impressive 3,093:1 contrast ratio. And with a recorded 85.7% coverage of DCI-P3, games looked saturated but not cartoonish, since MSI successfully adjusted mid-tones accordingly.

Read: MSI Optix MAG272CQR review

The Samsung 49-Inch Odyssey G9 is one of the most extreme monitors on this page. Not only is it a massive 49 inches diagonally, it also carries a 1000R curve, the most dramatic curve offered on a gaming monitor today. From a 2-3-feet distance, this panel will entirely fill your view. It’s like having two 27-inch, 1440p monitors in one.You’ll need nearly 4 feet of desk width and 17 inches of depth to accommodate it, but if you do, you’ll enjoy a wraparound gaming environment without image distortion. Looking for a smaller ultrawide? The Acer Predator X38 is an excellent option.

Testing of the 49-Inch Odyssey G9 revealed excellent contrast (2,152.9:1 after calibration), which climbed to 58,881.7:1 when it came to HDR testing. This is a bright monitor with a sharp picture and accurate DCI-P3 and sRGB color.

At this price though, we’d expect a little more. The monitor doesn’t offer any blur reduction; although, we typically opt for Adaptive-Sync over motion blur reduction and motion blur shouldn’t be an issue if you have a powerful enough graphics card. You also don’t get any speakers or, oddly, a framerate counter. But with solid image quality and a whole lot of speed for an ultrawide, some sacrifices are worth making.

More: Samsung 49-Inch Odyssey G9 review 

Currently going for $660, the ViewSonic Elite XG350R-C is cheaper than many other 35-inch ultrawides and ultrawides with less features (there’s even RGB lighting on the back of the XG350R-C). But what you’ll really love about the the XG350R-C is its vivid and accurate color that makes textures pop, skin tones look natural and everything look more realistic.

If you want life-changing HDR or to use HDR with Adaptive-Sync, look elsewhere. But in addition to a 21:9 aspect ratio, the Elite XG350R-C employs an 1800mm curve radius that engulfed us with strong image quality, making for an immersive ultrawide experience.

Read: ViewSonic Elite XG350R-C review

A monitor at this price is out of the question for many, but the Acer Predator X35 is exemplary of the type of monitor we’d love to have if price weren’t an object. With an impressive 180 Hz refresh rate and 2ms response time, it surpassed the more expensive Acer Predator X27 and Asus ROG Swift PG27UQ in our response time and input lag tests.

After calibration, contrast on this VA panel was 2,237:1, and HDR was fantastic, due to the Predator X35’s full-array local dimming (FALD) backlight. Combined with certification to hit a max brightness of at least 1,000 nits, which our testing confirmed at 1,060.8 nits, the Predator X35 greatly outperformed other screens when it came to HDR gaming, starting with an HDR contrast ratio of 74,545.5:1, according to our benchmarks.

Read: Acer Predator X35 review

If you’ve been wanting to try out an HDR monitor but can’t afford the best HDR monitors with FALD backlights, the ViewSonic Elite XG270QC is worth a look. It’s not quite FALD-quality, but with edge-lit backlighting, the runner-up, and a VA panel, this monitor’s HDR performance will definitely give you a noticeable upgrade over SDR.

In our benchmarks, this monitor kept up with other 165 Hz screens, such as the Dell S3220DGF above. For about $450, the XG270QC also delivers 1440p resolution with on-point gamma. Even without HDR, contrast hit 2,897:1 with our calibration settings. Plus, you get a surprisingly loud pair of 3W speakers.

Read: ViewSonic Elite XG270QC review

The Asus TUF Gaming VG259QM isn’t the only 240 Hz monitor here, but it’s the only one that overclocks to an impressive 280 Hz so impressively. It’s not only about the high refresh rate though. It’s also the ability to incorporate FreeSync (despite lacking certification) or G-Sync Compatibility alongside Asus’ Extreme Low Motion Blur (ELMB) feature that bests any monitor’s overdrive. With those features and 280 Hz, our inputs almost felt predicted. This is the kind of monitor that could actually help your game. Asus’ VG259QM topped our response time test and did admirably in terms of absolute input lag.

One of the downsides of this monitor is its HDR capability. Using an IPS panel with 1,000:1 contrast and only DisplayHDR 400 certification, HDR won’t look much better than SDR content. And, of course, you’ll need a decent graphics card to make the most out of this high-refresh screen.

But if you want one of the fastest monitors on the market, the VG259QM is up there. There are 360Hz monitors now, but 280 fps is more achievable than the 360 fps. And at $319, the VG259QM is favorably priced.

Read: Asus TUF Gaming VG259QM review  

We’ve tested three 360Hz gaming monitors, the Asus ROG Swift PG259QN, Alienware AW2521H and Acer Predator X25, and performance is so equal among the three that you could get either of them and not be able to tell the difference when it comes to speed and image quality. All three earned our Editor’s Choice Award in comparison to other high-end gaming monitors.

If we had to pick one though, the Asus ROG Swift PG259QN offers slightly more contrast than the Alienware and Acer; (although, this is only a little noticeable at faster speeds). The Asus was also 1ms faster than the Alienware and 2ms faster than the Acer in our input lag test.

However, this monitor lacks the Nvidia Reflex latency analyzer, which the Alienware and Acer include, but there’s a version that has it, the Asus ROG Swift PG259QNR. It’s more expensive ($800 instead of $700, as of writing) but also comes with a compatible Asus mouse.

While 360Hz is more speed than most gamers need and graphics cards can handle, if you’re an eSports gamer (or hopeful) and want the fastest of the fast, a monitor with a 360Hz refresh rate is now the way to go. Gaming at 360Hz on the Asus ROG Swift PG259QN () actually brought a noticeable impact to our gameplay. With backgrounds and objects being completely blur-free no matter how fast the movement, we were tricked into thinking we were better gamers.

Read: Asus ROG Swift PG259QN review  

The Samsung 27-inch CRG5 provides amazing speed at 1080p resolution, and the Porsche Design AOC Agon PD27 takes things to the next level, including a higher resolution, shorter response time and a price tag that’s more than twice the size.

For most, the CRG5 is in the sweet spot for a 240Hz monitor. Its 1080p resolution will require less graphics power than the 1440p PD27. When it came to our speed benchmarks, the PD27 was 1ms faster than the CRG5 in the response time test and 2ms slower in the absolute input lag test. Performance there is comparable, but the PD27 is also in a different style class.

With a unique metallic stand reminiscent of a racecar’s roll cage, LED lighting, including a projector that casts a customizable Porsche Design logo, and even its own remote, this monitor is as much about premium looks as it is about premium performance. If you want a little bit of it everything, it’s tough to beat this stylish monitor.

Read: Porsche Design AOC Agon PD27 review 

Savings on Best Gaming Monitors

When shopping for any gaming monitor, including those above, you may save some money by checking out our lists of best computer monitor deals, Dell Coupon Codes, Lenovo coupon codes, LG coupon codes or Newegg coupon codes.